Professional Experiences of Chambers Yang

文章摘要 本文介绍了杨律师的执业经历与专业领域。杨律师自1995年起执业,长期为国有企业、外商投资企业及高科技民营企业提供法律服务,业务涵盖公司设立、股份发行、股权转让、并购重组、外商投资、房地产与建筑工程、知识产权及互联网电子商务法律事务。他处理过多个具有代表性的案件,包括上海首例外商投资企业特别清算案、中央广场转让案等,并在域名争议、反不正当竞争领域有深入实践。文章对了解中国资深律师在跨境投资、公司治理及新兴法律领域的实务经验具有参考价值。

  • Legal counsel
    Mr. Yang worked as an in-house counsel with Shanghai Southeast Company of CMST after his graduation from Fudan University . Since 1995 when he became an attorney-at-law, Mr. Yang has been retained as the legal counsel of many state-owned corporations, foreign-invested enterprises and private high-tech companies, including Raw Water Company (PLC), Nippon Paint, Shanghai Futures Exchange, Wuxi Life Technology Park, Xianfeng Pharmaceuticals, New Asiatic Pharmaceuticals, Munich Trade Fairs, Dealeasy Electronics , Viva Eco Electronics & Technology, Haiwen Group, Huabo Science and Technology Group, Vzoom Science and Technology.


  • Corporate issues, securities and foreign investment
    Mr. Yang has handled a number of cases in incorporation, shares issuance and equity transfer, merger & acquisition and liquidation of foreign-invested companies, private and state-owned companies, of which the special liquidation of Haijing Hotel Co., Ltd. is the first case of special liquidation of a foreign-invested company in Shanghai . Mr. Yang has handled many typical cases, including the incorporation of Shanghai Suzhou River Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (wholly state-owned), Wuxi Life Science & Technology Development Stock Company, the joint venture between Shanghai Pharma Group and Italian SOLGMA Group, M & A of some domestic and foreign-invested companies, etc. Mr. Yang was invited to give keynote speeches on foreign investment laws and policies in China at some international and national conferences, including the China Food & Drinks Retail & Distribution Conference, the Ports & Liners China 2002 and China Containers 2004.


  • Real Estate and Construction
    Mr. Yang has provided legal services for the whole procedure of some large real estate development projects including the New Bond Garden and the Future Star Town, the whole procedure of workshop construction by Nippon Paint and BauschLinnemann, including co-operation negotiation, incorporation of the project company, project design, construction, project financing, sale and rent and property management. Mr. Yang has also provided legal services for a number of cases of real estate transfer projects, including those transfers for the Central Plaza and the Christ Plaza (of which the Central Plaza transfer project was honored as one of the best-resolved cases by the Ministry of Justice, China ). In addition, Mr. Yang has handled many cases on real estate co-operation development, sale and rent, property management, hotel management, construction, etc.


  • Intellectual Property Right
    Mr. Yang has resolved some disputes in copyright, trade mark, trade name and anti-unfair competition, of which the “Pure” water case attracts much attention from the legal circle for its relation to trade mark, anti-unfair competition, corporate management and shareholder's interest. And the Nippon Paint anti-unfair competition case also drew much attention from the society. Mr. Yang is engaged as an expert by Beijing Jiuzhou Shichu Intellectual Property Right Appraisal Center .


  • Internet, Telecommunication and E-commerce
    Mr. Yang is also specialized in Internet, telecommunication and e-commerce law. He has been invited to attend the First E-commerce Legislation Forum and a number of other forums and seminars. His article of “Legal Issues on Domain Name and its Management” was included in the book of Economic & Legal Development under the Global Background , and the article of “Restructuring a Scientific & Unified Domain Name Management System” was published in the journal of “ Electronic Intellectual Property Right ”. The article of “International Business Arbitration of the Internet Age” was published by China Daily. Mr. Yang is engaged as an expert by the Domain Name Dispute Service Center affiliated to the United States domain name Doctor Consulting Company. Mr. Yang is also the legal counsel of Vzoom and Jianding Construction Website, providing special legal services for the systematic website development of Shanghai Futures Exchange. Mr. Yang is the attorney for the case of the domain name dispute between Amazon Co. and a Shanghai Company.
  • 最后编辑于:2018-09-01 10:55

    杨春宝一级律师简介

    杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团,具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多

    常见法律问题

    外商投资企业特别清算有哪些法律要点?

    外商投资企业特别清算是中国外商投资法律实践中的一项特殊制度,适用于企业因经营困难、提前终止合同或章程约定的其他情形而需要解散清算,但无法按照普通清算程序正常进行的情况。杨律师处理的上海首例外商投资企业特别清算案,确立了此类程序的实务操作框架。从法律原则看,特别清算的启动通常需要企业权力机构作出决议,并依法组成清算委员会,清算委员会负责清理企业财产、编制资产负债表和财产清单、处理债权债务、分配剩余财产等。实务操作中,特别清算往往涉及股东之间矛盾、外方权益保护、资产处置价格公允性等问题,清算组需要严格遵循法定程序,确保清算方案合法且可执行。常见争议焦点包括清算组的组成方式、清算财产的评估方法、优先债权与普通债权的清偿顺序,以及清算期间企业的法律地位。对于外资企业而言,还需注意外汇管理、税务注销及海关手续的衔接。建议企业在进入清算程序前,全面梳理合同履行情况、员工安置预案及或有负债,必要时聘请专业律师主导清算流程,以避免因程序瑕疵导致清算结果被撤销或股东承担个人责任。

    房地产项目全程法律服务涵盖哪些环节?

    房地产项目全程法律服务是杨律师的核心业务之一,其服务范围贯穿项目从前期构想到后期运营的全生命周期。具体而言,包括项目合作谈判、项目公司设立、土地使用权的取得与出让合同的审核、规划设计阶段的法律合规审查、建设工程施工合同的起草与履行监管、项目融资方案的设计与担保安排、商品房的预售与销售、物业租赁及后期物业管理等环节。在实务中,律师需要协调政府部门、开发商、施工单位、金融机构及业主等多方利益,确保每一环节符合法律强制性规定,防范合同风险与行政合规风险。常见争议焦点包括土地闲置风险、建设工程价款优先受偿权冲突、商品房买卖合同纠纷、逾期交付责任认定以及物业费纠纷等。律师的全程参与能够帮助开发商提前识别法律障碍,优化交易结构,减少诉讼与行政处罚的可能。此外,对于涉及外商投资或国企合作的房地产项目,还需特别关注国有资产评估备案、境外资金结汇、项目公司股权架构等特殊要求。

    域名争议解决的主要法律实务规则是什么?

    域名争议属于互联网知识产权领域的重要纠纷类型,杨律师曾代理亚马逊公司与上海某公司的域名争议案,并担任域名争议解决中心的专家,积累了丰富的实务经验。根据现行法律原则,域名争议的解决主要依据域名注册管理机构制定的统一争议解决政策,以及民事诉讼程序。实务中,投诉人需要证明三个核心要件:一是被投诉域名与其享有合法权益的名称或标志相同或足以导致混淆;二是被投诉人对域名不享有合法权益;三是被投诉人对域名的注册和使用具有恶意。常见恶意情形包括为出售、出租域名获取不当利益而注册、为阻止权利人使用而注册、以及通过域名混淆吸引流量牟利等。争议解决程序通常由经认证的争议解决机构受理,专家在收到材料后作出裁决,裁决的结果包括注销域名或转移域名。需要注意的是,行政投诉并非终局,任何一方均可向法院起诉。对于企业而言,防御性注册与监测是避免争议的首要策略,一旦发生争议,应快速收集证据,尤其是域名注册时间、使用方式及商标权利证明。域名争议与传统商标侵权在“使用”的认定上有所不同,争议焦点往往集中在如何判定“恶意”与“合法权益”,这需要结合具体交易背景、域名解析用途等因素综合判断。

    以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn

    • 本站声明:本站所载之法律论文、法律评论、案例、法律咨询等,除非另有注明,著作权人均为站长杨春宝高级律师本人。欢迎其他网站链接,但是,未经书面许可,不得擅自摘编、转载。引用及经许可转载时均应注明作者和出处"法律桥",并链接本站。本站网址:https://shanghaiiplawyer.com/。
    •  
    •         本站所有内容(包括法律咨询、法律法规)仅供参考,不构成法律意见,本站不对资料的完整性和时效性负责。您在处理具体法律事务时,请洽询有资质的律师。本站将努力为广大网友提供更好的服务,但不对本站提供的任何免费服务作出正式的承诺。本站所载投稿文章,其言论不代表本站观点,如需使用,请与原作者联系,版权归原作者所有。

    发表回复