Chinese Crt Issues Prison Terms For Software Piracy

文章摘要 本文报道了2009年中国法院对一起大规模软件盗版案的刑事判决,四名被告因非法复制发行微软Windows操作系统等软件,被判处2至3.5年有期徒刑并处罚金1100万元。该案被称为中国最大的软件版权侵权案,标志着中国对网络盗版刑事打击的重要进展。文章分析了案件的法律意义、实务中软件盗版追诉的难点以及社会反响,对于理解中国知识产权刑事保护实践具有参考价值。

A Chinese court sentenced four people to prison and levied roughly $1.6 million in fines against them for various counts of software copyright infringement, in what an industry group cheered as a major victory in a market where piracy is rampant.

Hong Lei and Sun Xianzhong, founders of Chengdu Gongruan Network Technology Co., and two others within the company were sentenced Thursday to 2 to 3 1/2 years in prison and collectively fined 11 million yuan ($1.6 million) by a district court in the eastern Chinese city of Suzhou. The state-controlled Xinhua news agency called it China's biggest software copyright infringement case.

The defendants were accused of illegally distributing software, including Microsoft Corp.'s Windows operating system, which they re-created and distributed free under their own brand on Tomatolei, a Web site through which they offered free software downloads. The popular Windows clone was called Tomato Garden Windows XP.

Reached by phone, Mr. Hong's father declined to comment. The defendants' attorneys couldn't be reached.

'This is the first successful criminal case to crack down on such large-scale online software piracy in China,' said the Business Software Alliance, a Washington-based industry group. According to the BSA, which represents a number of multinational technology companies including Microsoft, Intel Corp. and Adobe Systems Inc., Tomatolei was China's largest online software piracy syndicate. The case 'marks a milestone in China's efforts to crack down on Internet piracy,' it said. Authorities moved against Tomatolei after receiving complaints from the BSA last year.

Lawyers say the verdict is important because it is often difficult to seek criminal charges against software pirates in China, where many companies complain that rampant copyright infringement hurts their business.

Yang Chunbao, an intellectual-property lawyer for Haworth & Lexon in Shanghai, said makers of pirated software are often sued in civil court for tens of millions of yuan but fined only a fraction of that. This recent sentence was 'really harsh,' he said. 'The fine amount is unusual.' It's unclear how aggressively China will continue to pursue piracy, however.

Microsoft and other copyright owners have long complained that the Chinese government's punishments for piracy have been too soft, allowing companies like Gongruan to flourish. Just this week, California Democrat Howard L. Berman, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said China's 'weak and ineffective efforts to stop intellectual property theft' cost billions of dollars a year.

In a statement, Microsoft said this new sentence would serve as a warning to counterfeiters of software products.

In China, computer users can easily pirate software for less than $2, or download software like Tomato Garden free of charge. Some software resellers would provide Tomato Garden's pirated Windows software on computer disks or would offer to preinstall the operating software on new PCs. Microsoft estimates that a significant portion of users in China unknowingly use pirated versions of Windows because it is so easy for sellers to preinstall the software and then sell the PCs at lower prices.

The case has sparked discussions on China's Internet forums, where thousands of users admitted to using Tomato Garden.

One user from Guangdong province said that without pirated software, 'I wouldn't have the chance to use a computer. . . . I show my respect to those who could decode Microsoft's software and share it with others.'

Microsoft cut prices last year to encourage consumers to use legitimate versions of its software. In China, home and student versions of Microsoft Office cost less than $30. The software starts at about $100 in the U.S.

China, the world's second-largest personal computer market by shipments, is increasingly important to technology companies world-wide, especially as companies and consumers are spending less in the wake of the economic downturn.


(Source: The Wall Street Journal, Augest 25th, 2009)

杨春宝一级律师简介

杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团,具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多

常见法律问题

本案中法院对软件盗版者判处了哪些刑罚?

本案中,法院依据中国刑法关于侵犯著作权罪的规定,对四名被告人分别判处了2年至3年6个月不等的有期徒刑,并处以总额1100万元人民币的罚金。这是当时中国法院对软件盗版行为作出的最严厉刑事判决之一。实务中,侵犯著作权罪的刑罚包括自由刑和财产刑。自由刑方面,根据犯罪情节的严重程度,可判处三年以下有期徒刑或拘役,情节特别严重的可判处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑。本案中主犯刑期达3.5年,属于情节特别严重的量刑。罚金刑方面,法院通常根据违法所得或非法经营数额确定,本案1100万元罚金数额巨大,体现了对大规模盗版行为的严厉打击。律师评价该罚款“不寻常”,因为以往同类案件民事赔偿或行政罚款往往较低。该判决对潜在盗版者形成威慑,但后续执行和追缴仍需关注。此外,本案还涉及没收违法所得、追缴侵权工具等附加措施。对于企业而言,应建立合规软件管理制度,避免使用未经授权的软件,否则可能面临刑事追诉风险。权利人应积极收集证据并向执法机关举报,同时可采取民事索赔、行政投诉等多元化手段。近年来,中国通过修改著作权法、降低刑事门槛等措施逐步加强打击力度,但实务中仍存在执行不到位的问题,需要持续完善司法实践。

为什么软件盗版案件在中国刑事追诉难度较大?

软件盗版案件在中国刑事追诉难度较大,主要原因包括:第一,取证困难。盗版软件通常通过网络传播,服务器可能设在境外,行为人使用匿名或虚假身份,导致侦查机关难以锁定嫌疑人并获取完整证据链。第二,违法所得认定复杂。盗版软件往往免费提供或低价销售,部分行为人通过捆绑广告、收集用户数据等方式间接获利,传统违法所得计算方式难以适用。第三,刑事立案门槛较高。根据司法实践,侵犯著作权罪的追诉标准通常要求非法经营数额达到一定数额(如五万元以上)或违法所得数额达到三万元以上,或复制品数量达到一定标准(如五百张以上)。小规模盗版行为往往仅通过民事或行政途径处理。第四,社会认知偏差。部分用户认为盗版软件降低使用门槛,甚至对盗版者持同情态度,影响执法意愿。第五,跨区域、跨国界执法协作困难。本案中,BSA(商业软件联盟)投诉后,公安机关才得以启动调查,说明权利人主动维权是重要推动力。实务中,权利人应积极收集证据并向执法机关举报,同时可采取民事索赔、行政投诉等多元化手段。对于企业而言,应建立内部软件资产管理机制,防止员工使用盗版软件导致法律风险。此外,近年来中国通过修改著作权法、降低刑事门槛等措施逐步加强打击力度,但实务中仍存在执行不到位的问题,需要持续完善司法实践。

本案对中国软件版权保护有何里程碑意义?

本案被誉为中国打击网络软件盗版的里程碑,主要体现在以下方面:第一,它是中国首次对大规模网络软件盗版组织成功追究刑事责任,此前类似案件多以民事或行政方式处理,刑事判决极为罕见。第二,判决的刑罚力度前所未有,四名被告被判处2至3.5年监禁并处罚金1100万元,远超此前同类案件,彰显了司法对知识产权保护的决心。第三,案件涉及知名软件Windows XP的盗版克隆版本“番茄花园”,该盗版软件在中国用户量极大,影响广泛,判决对广大用户和盗版制作者产生强烈震慑作用。第四,该案得到了国际组织(如商业软件联盟BSA)和跨国企业(如微软)的高度关注,被视为中国履行国际知识产权保护承诺的标志性事件。第五,案件引发了社会对盗版软件合法性的广泛讨论,许多用户开始反思使用盗版软件的法律和道德风险,推动了正版化进程。从法律实务角度看,后续在类似案件中,法院逐渐加大对侵犯著作权罪的刑事打击力度,如提高罚金、适用缓刑控制等。同时,权利人维权路径更加清晰,可通过刑事报案、民事诉讼、行政投诉等多渠道维权。但也要注意,本案发生在2009年,随着互联网发展,盗版形式从光盘、网站下载转向云盘、P2P等,法律适用面临新挑战。企业应关注最新司法解释,了解电子数据取证规则,定期进行软件合规审计,避免因使用盗版软件而承担刑事责任。此外,个人用户也应提高法律意识,避免下载使用未经授权的软件,否则可能面临民事赔偿甚至刑事追诉风险。

以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn

  • 本站声明:本站所载之法律论文、法律评论、案例、法律咨询等,除非另有注明,著作权人均为站长杨春宝高级律师本人。欢迎其他网站链接,但是,未经书面许可,不得擅自摘编、转载。引用及经许可转载时均应注明作者和出处"法律桥",并链接本站。本站网址:https://shanghaiiplawyer.com/。
  •  
  •         本站所有内容(包括法律咨询、法律法规)仅供参考,不构成法律意见,本站不对资料的完整性和时效性负责。您在处理具体法律事务时,请洽询有资质的律师。本站将努力为广大网友提供更好的服务,但不对本站提供的任何免费服务作出正式的承诺。本站所载投稿文章,其言论不代表本站观点,如需使用,请与原作者联系,版权归原作者所有。

发表回复