Speech: Protect Your Brand in China

文章摘要 本文围绕外国企业在华商标保护实务,系统梳理商标注册与侵权救济两大板块。注册方面强调及时申请、遵循注册在先原则,结合德国公司被经销商抢注、蓝色风暴案、凌志与索爱等案例,指出商标应使用中文、便于识别记忆,建议以控股公司名义注册并覆盖类似商品,同时保持与商号、域名一致。救济方面涵盖海关备案扣留、工商投诉行政保护以及司法诉讼路径,明确管辖法院、适格原告被告、侵权行为类型、证据准备与损害赔偿计算规则,并借助立邦案展示商号与域名冲突的应对策略。文章为企业在华商标布局和维权提供实务操作指引。

Part One

Some Suggestions for Trademark Registration in China

 

 

1.  File Trademark Application in time

|          The territory trait of trademark right  

|          Principle of first to register

 

 

Case 1

One Germany company appointed a Chinese company as an authorized distributor of the products bearing its own logo. Without permission of the German company, the authorized distributor filed an trademark  application for this logo. This act has caused severely negative effects on the marketing of the Germany company.

 

 

Case 2  Trademark Infringement Case in respect of “蓝色风暴”

A wine company in Zhejiang Province was granted the trademark right of “蓝色风暴”  for the goods of beer, cola etc.

Later, they found a world famous drinks company used “蓝色风暴” in the promotion, ads and package of its cola products.

 

The judgment:

The court held that the drinks company had spent a large amount of money on the promotion of “蓝色风暴” for so long time. As a matter of fact,  “蓝色风暴” became a trademark of the drinks company. For this reason, the court held this acts is an infringement of the exclusive right regarding “蓝色风暴” of the Zhejiang wine company. 

 

 

2.  Keep in Conformity with Chinese Language Habits and Customer Habits

|          Trademarks are suggested to be Chinese words 

|          Easily-identified, easily-memorized

|          Words that are familiar to or are recognized by the customers

 

 

Case 3  Lexus

Lexus is a famous brand of Toyota. Before Toyota sold Lexus in China, it was translated as “凌志” but has not been registered. When Toyota began to sell Lexus in China, the brand name had to be changed into “雷克萨斯”, because “凌志” had been registered by someone else.

 

 

Case 4   “索爱” Trademark Case

One person filed trademark application for “索爱” and was granted exclusive right to this trademark  in 2004. One year later, Sony Ericsson company filed a request for cancelation of this trademark, but the request was  not supported by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board  and the court.

 

 

3.  The Registration Shall be Under the name of the Holding Company

Purpose:

|          Centralized management of intangible assets

|          Transfer of Loyalty

|          Avoid being involved to liquidation or other relevant procedure of the WFOE or JV

 

 

4.  The Registration Shall Cover Similar Goods

Purpose:

|          Prevent from registration in similar goods by others

|          Prevent from potential trademark infringement

 

 

Case 5

A clothing company registered its logo in China for goods of clothes. Later the company found someone else used the same logo on glasses. Because their trademark application doesn’t cover glasses, the clothing company failed to claim for damages or stop such sales.

 

 

5.  Keep in Conformity with the Trade name and Domain name

Purpose:

|          Prevent from registration by others and customers being confused

|          Prevent from potential trademark infringement

 

 

Part Two

Remedy of Trademark Infringement

 

 

1.  Customs Protection of Intellectual Property Rights

Put on record → Apply for detaining of suspected infringing goods → Investigation of Customs→Make the decision

 

 

2.  Measures for Administrative Protection of Trademark

Report →Negotiation→Make a decision by Administration Bureau for Industry and Commerce →administrative proceedings civil proceedings 

 

 

3.  Judicial Protection of Trademark

Laws and Regulations:

|           Trademark Law of PRC,

|           Interpretations of the Supreme People’s Court on Several issues concerning the Application of Law to the Trial of Cases of Civil Disputes over the Trademarks

 

(1)Jurisdiction

|          Where the infringing acts take place

|          Where the infringing goods are stored or detained

|          Where the defendant is domiciled 

 

(2)The concerned parties

As plaintiff

|          Trademark registrant

|          licensees under sole licensing contracts

|          Licensees under exclusive licensing contracts can bring a joint suit together with the trademark registrant and can also bring a suit by themselves if the trademark registrant does not bring a suit

|          Licensees under non-exclusive licensing contracts , provided that they have been given clear authorization to do so by the trademark registrant

 

As defendant:

|          Producers of infringing goods

|          Sellers of infringing goods

|          Who counterfeit, or to make, without authorization, representations of a registered trademark of another person, or to sell such representations

 

(3)Infringing acts

|          To use a trademark that is identical with or similar to a registered trademark in respect of the identical or similar goods without the authorization from the trademark registrant;

|          To sell goods bear a counterfeited registered trademark;

|          To counterfeit, or to make, without authorization, representations of a registered trademark of another person, or to sell such representations of a registered trademark as were counterfeited, or made without authorization;

|          To replace, without the consent of the trademark registrant, its or his registered trademark and market again the goods bearing the replaced trademark

|          To use the words identical or similar to another's registered trademark as a trade name in a distinctive manner on identical or similar goods, and thus causing possible confusion among the relative public;

|          To copy, imitate, translate another's well-known registered trademark or its dominant part to be used as a trademark on non-similar or non-identical goods and thus mislead consumers and possibly causing damage to the interest of the well-known trademark  owner;

|          To registrate words identical with or similar to another's registered trademark as a domain name, and to conduct e-commerce in the goods through this domain name, which is likely to cause confusion among relative public;

|          Other infringing acts.

 

(4)The Evidence Shall be provided

|          A legitimate and effective certificate of trademark ownership or authorization;

|          Evidence of infringing acts,such as the  process of purchase of infringing goods, the infringing goods;

|          Evidence of the claim for damages.

 

(5)Calculation of Damages

|          The profit that the infringer has earned because of the infringement in the period of the infringement;

|          The injury that the trademark registrant has suffered from the infringement in the period of the infringement;

|          The appropriate expenses of the trademark registrant for stopping the infringement;

|          An amount of damages of no more than RMB 500, 000 Yuan.

 

 

Case 6  “立邦” Trademark Cases

Conflict between trademark and trade name

A company registered “立邦” as its trade name. Nippon Paint company then brought a suit against this company.

Finally, the court held the use of “立邦” as trade name violated the exclusive right of Nippon paint company and the trade name shall be changed to the words other than “立邦”.

 

 

Conflict between trademark and domain name

Nippon Paint company found that one person registered a domain name containing “nippon”. Then, under the authorization of Nippon paint company, our law firm submitted the dispute to Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre, demanding transfer the domain name “nipponpaint.asia” to Nippon Paint company.

Eventually, we won this case and the domain name had been

transferred.

 

 

Q&A

 

 

Thanks!

                 

|    Chambers Yang    Partner/Attorney

 

|     37F, Hongkong Plaza, 283 Huaihai Rd(M),Shanghai, China

|     Tel: 0086 21 6385 9090

|     Fax: 0086 21 6390 6651

|     Email: Chambers@hllawyers.com

杨春宝一级律师简介

杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团,具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多

常见法律问题

在中国注册商标时,企业应当注意哪些核心策略?

中国商标法实行注册在先原则,商标权具有地域性,只有在国内获准注册才能获得排他性保护。商标注册申请应当及时提交,避免被他人抢注;同时,商标应贴合中文语言习惯和消费者认知,选择易识别、易记忆的中文词汇,以增强市场识别度。注册主体建议为控股公司,便于无形资产集中管理,并避免因合资企业或外资企业清算而影响商标权属。注册范围应覆盖核心商品及类似商品,防止他人在关联商品上搭便车。

文章列举了多起案例:一家德国公司授权中国经销商销售产品,经销商未经许可抢注其商标,导致德国公司市场推广受阻;浙江某酒企注册《蓝色风暴》商标用于啤酒等商品,国际知名饮料公司将其用于可乐促销宣传,法院认定构成侵权;丰田公司因先前未注册《凌志》中文名称,进入中国市场时只能改用《雷克萨斯》;个人抢先注册《索爱》商标,索尼爱立信公司请求撤销未获支持;某服装公司仅注册服装类商标,他人在眼镜上使用相同标识,服装公司因注册范围不足而无法维权。

企业应制定商标注册计划,在产品上市前或进入中国市场前尽早提交申请;对重要标识进行中文翻译或独创中文名称,并进行全类或防御性注册,至少覆盖现有及未来可能拓展的商品和服务类别。建议以控股公司作为注册主体,并保持商标、商号与域名三者的统一,防止他人抢注。日常应建立商标监控机制,及时发现近似商标申请或使用行为,为后续异议或维权保留证据。

在中国发现商标被侵权后,企业可以通过哪些途径获得救济?

商标侵权救济可分为海关保护、行政保护和司法保护三大路径。海关保护要求企业先将商标权在海关总署备案,发现涉嫌侵权货物时申请扣留,由海关调查并作出处理决定。行政保护是向市场监督管理部门举报,通过行政程序责令停止侵权。司法保护则通过民事诉讼请求停止侵害、赔偿损失,诉讼管辖地包括侵权行为地、侵权商品存储地或被告住所地法院。原告主体包括商标注册人、独占被许可人、排他被许可人在特定条件下可单独或共同起诉,普通被许可人经明确授权也可起诉。被告包括侵权商品生产者、销售者以及伪造注册商标标识者。

文章在司法保护部分详细列举了侵权行为的典型表现形式,如未经许可在同种或类似商品上使用相同或近似商标,销售伪造注册商标商品,擅自更换注册商标并将商品再次投入市场,将他人注册商标作为商号使用造成混淆,抢注他人驰名商标作为域名从事电子商务等。赔偿计算上,可以按照侵权人获利或权利人损失确定,并支持合理维权开支,无法确定时适用法定赔偿上限。文章还介绍了《立邦》商标冲突案:一家公司将《立邦》作为商号登记,立邦涂料公司起诉后法院认定商号使用构成侵权,责令变更商号;对于包含《nippon》的域名,则通过域名争议解决程序成功转移。

企业应事先办理海关备案,形成知识产权边境保护网络。发现侵权后,可同时采取行政投诉和民事诉讼,利用行政程序快速制止侵权,再通过民事程序索赔。维权前应系统收集权属证书、购买侵权产品的凭证、侵权实物以及损失或获利证据。注意适格原告的身份要求,许可使用合同应明确授权条款。对于商号或域名冲突,应及时向企业名称登记机关提出异议或通过域名争议解决机构处理,避免因拖延导致损失扩大。同时需关注法定赔偿与惩罚性赔偿的适用条件,合理计算索赔金额。

商标与商号、域名发生冲突时,企业应如何应对?

商号是经营主体名称的核心部分,域名是互联网地址的标识,二者若与他人注册商标相同或近似并产生市场混淆,可能构成商标侵权。商标法保护注册商标的专用权,将他人注册商标作为企业名称中的字号使用,在相同或类似商品上突出显示,容易使相关公众产生误认的,属于侵权行为。将他人注册商标或其主要部分注册为域名,并在该域名下进行商品电子商务,足以造成相关公众混淆的,同样构成侵权。权利人可以向法院提起侵权诉讼,也可以针对域名争议向专门的争议解决机构投诉。

文章中的《立邦》案例展示了两种情形:一是某公司登记《立邦》作为商号,立邦涂料公司起诉后法院认定该商号使用侵害其商标权,判决变更商号;二是有人注册含《nippon》的域名,立邦涂料公司授权中国律师向亚洲域名争议解决中心提交投诉,最终成功获得域名转移。此外,前文提到的服装公司案例也说明,若商标注册范围未覆盖对方使用的商品类别,即使标识相同也难以主张侵权,可见商标注册类别规划对应对商号、域名冲突同样重要。

企业应当将商标、商号和域名统一规划,在设立公司、注册域名之前先检索商标可注册性,避免自身使用的字号或域名侵犯他人权利。对于既有的冲突,第一,向企业登记机关提出名称争议或变更申请;第二,通过民事诉讼主张侵权并要求停止使用、变更名称;第三,针对域名可向域名争议解决机构提交投诉,条件包括域名与商标相同或混淆性近似、注册人对域名无权利或正当利益、域名被恶意注册和使用。维权时需提交商标注册证、知名度证据以及对方使用造成混淆或恶意的证据。同时,企业自身也应避免将他人知名商标用于商号或域名,以降低被诉风险。

以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn

  • 本站声明:本站所载之法律论文、法律评论、案例、法律咨询等,除非另有注明,著作权人均为站长杨春宝高级律师本人。欢迎其他网站链接,但是,未经书面许可,不得擅自摘编、转载。引用及经许可转载时均应注明作者和出处"法律桥",并链接本站。本站网址:https://shanghaiiplawyer.com/。
  •  
  •         本站所有内容(包括法律咨询、法律法规)仅供参考,不构成法律意见,本站不对资料的完整性和时效性负责。您在处理具体法律事务时,请洽询有资质的律师。本站将努力为广大网友提供更好的服务,但不对本站提供的任何免费服务作出正式的承诺。本站所载投稿文章,其言论不代表本站观点,如需使用,请与原作者联系,版权归原作者所有。

发表回复